bug-texinfo
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Locale-independent paragraph formatting


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: Locale-independent paragraph formatting
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 08:47:10 +0200

> From: Gavin Smith <gavinsmith0123@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 21:26:11 +0000
> 
> I have just pushed a commit (e3a28cc9bf) to use gnulib/libunistring
> functions instead of the locale-dependent functions mbrtowc and wcwidth.
> This allows for a significant simplification as we do not have to try
> to switch to a UTF-8 encoded locale.
> 
> I was not sure about how to put a char32_t literal in the source code.
> For example, where we previously had L'a' as a literal wchar_t letter 'a',
> I changed this to U'a'.  I could not find very much information about this
> online or whether this would be widely supported by C compilers.  The U prefix
> for char32_t is mentioned in a copy of the C11 standard I found online and
> also in a C23 draft.

I have MinGW GCC 9.2 here, and it supports U'a'.  But I don't think we
need it, we could just use 'a' instead, see below.

OTOH, the char32_t type is not supported by this GCC, not even if I
use -std=gnu2x.  Maybe we should use uint_least32_t instead?

> Does anybody know if we could just write 'a' instead of U'a' and rely
> on it being converted?
> 
> E.g. if you do
> 
> char32_t c = 'a';
> 
> then afterwards, c should be equal to 97 (ASCII value of 'a').

Why not?  What could be the problems with using this?



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]