[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Sep 2024 21:14:15 +0100 |
On Sun, Sep 08, 2024 at 09:38:13PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 08, 2024 at 08:07:41PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2024 at 06:46:39PM +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have added the EPUB_STRICT customization variable, it does 2 things
> > > 1) sets dcterms:modified
> > > 2) set an internal customization variable such that td width is not
> > > set with an attribute but with inline CSS
> > >
> > > Should I document it?
> >
> > THanks for doing this. I don't think it needs to be documented but would
> > needed added as an exception in doc/refcard/txivarcheck.
>
> It is not set in the default case... If we do not document it, I can't
> see how it would be used (outside of
> maintain/check_epubcheck_texi_t.sh)...
Oh, I thought it would be set in epub3.pm for EPUB output.
> > > - <a> in <a> for nested @-commands formatted with <a>
> >
> > This is certainly a bug in texi2any's output but one that may not be
> > easy to fix and only occurs for rare input that the user can change
> > themselves.
>
> I do not think that it is a bug in texi2any's output. It is simply that
> Texinfo allow for nested references in some cases, while HTML never
> allows that. Since the browser render nested <a> as we would expect to
> match Texinfo semantics, I see no point in doing something different in
> texi2any. We could document that nested Texinfo @-commands output as
> <a> will lead to invalid HTML, to help users change their input, but to
> me that's it.
Ok, it's not a big deal.
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, (continued)
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Gavin Smith, 2024/09/02
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Patrice Dumas, 2024/09/03
- Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Patrice Dumas, 2024/09/06
- SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for dcterms:modified?, Gavin Smith, 2024/09/20
- Re: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for dcterms:modified?, Patrice Dumas, 2024/09/20
- Re: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for dcterms:modified?, Patrice Dumas, 2024/09/20
- Re: SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for dcterms:modified?, Gavin Smith, 2024/09/20
Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Patrice Dumas, 2024/09/08
Re: EPUB 3.3 spec conformity issues, Gavin Smith, 2024/09/23