[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-zile] Renaming tests
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-zile] Renaming tests |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:51:04 +0000 |
Hi Reuben,
On 29 Feb 2012, at 19:41, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> On 29 February 2012 19:36, Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Gary, I see you've been renaming tests in the lua branch
>
> …and adding them too! Can we have the new tests in stable too, please?
> Might as well stay honest about how many bugs are left in the C.
Found a little time for GNU hacking today, so...
I cherry-picked all the tests patches from lua to master, after which
master now has 3 Zile failing test cases:
tests/interactive/backward-char.el
tests/interactive/backward-delete-char.el
tests/interactive/backward-kill-word.el
The first two were fixed in the lua branch by 07c644b, and which I
attempted to port to master with 903ce3a. The idea is simply to make
\C-? a valid read syntax for 0x7f and then add global key bindings so
that we can use it in execute-kbd-macro without worrying about what
terminfo says about the kbs cap. I've run out of hacking time again
before I could figure out why my ported patch didn't fix those.
The other one is a mystery, and doesn't fail on the lua branch, although
it uses \M-? inside execute-kbd-macro (the other two use \C-? and \M-\C-?,
so maybe I uncovered a new master branch bug with reading '?' inside
execute-kbd-macro...
Since you know your way around the C sources so much better than me, I'll
leave finding the right fix in your capable hands :-p
I also found a display bug in interactive mode on the C branch, but I'll
raise a new ticket at Savannah for that.
Cheers,
--
Gary V. Vaughan (gary AT gnu DOT org)
- Re: [Bug-zile] Renaming tests,
Gary V. Vaughan <=