Re: #1806: Finding missing dependencies

[Chicken Trac]

#1806: Finding missing dependencies
---------------------------------------+---------------------
            Reporter:  Idiomdrottning  |      Owner:  (none)
                Type:  enhancement     |     Status:  closed
            Priority:  minor           |  Milestone:  someday
           Component:  compiler        |    Version:  5.3.0
          Resolution:  wontfix         |   Keywords:
Estimated difficulty:                  |
---------------------------------------+---------------------
Changes (by sjamaan):

 * status:  new => closed
 * resolution:   => wontfix


Comment:

 One problem with that is that the toplevel can be extended with `eval` or
 `load`, so the procedure could be left undefined and then defined by (say)
 loading a configuration file.

 Another problem is that you can link multiple "compilation units"
 together. So with a.scm containing the import and b.scm containing the
 rest of the code, you could compile them separately and link them together
 after which it will work.

 Modules, on the other hand, have to be fully resolved.

 With csc you can always use the `-m` switch to wrap your code in a module,
 even if the code itself doesn't have a module.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1806#comment:1>
CHICKEN Scheme <https://www.call-cc.org/>
CHICKEN Scheme is a compiler for the Scheme programming language.