Re: [Chicken-users] ideas

[Panagiotis Vossos]

felix <address@hidden> writes:

> Ideally, the conversion should be simple and the format should be 
> robust and easy to understand. There seems to be a tendency towards
> texinfo here, is that right? As long as we can generate HTML for
> the Windows world, we should be fine.

With the latest versions of texinfo (>= 4.1) you can even generate xml
and docbook output.

> So why don't we just take texinfo? ok?

I really think that texinfo is the best choice for the job.  I don't
have enough free time to convert the whole thing myself, but could
certainly do parts of it.

regards,
panagiotis