Re: [Chicken-users] need idea for read-syntax

[Category 5]

Felix Winkelmann <address@hidden> writes:

>> How about this:
>>
>>     statement sequence:  #{ ... }#
>>     typed value:         #{[c-string] var}#
>>
>
> Yes, that's going to be it, I guess. But I'm also tending to leave it
> out entirely...

Yeah, I think we're starting to strain the cramped bounds of ASCII a
bit.  Hmmn.  My current feeling is that #{ ... }# is a good idea for
statements but that the typed case should be left out.  I think I'd be
happier just seeing a (define-foreign-variable ...) and a decent naming
convention in that case.

--