chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] TinyCLOS primitive classes: Where's <list>?


From: Joel Reymont
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] TinyCLOS primitive classes: Where's <list>?
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:24:12 +0000

> felix winkelmann wrote:

>No, there isn't any <list> class, wouldn't <pair> be sufficient?
>(computing the type of something that's a list, is not a constant
>time operation, one has to traverse the whole list, possibly checking
>for circularities, etc.)

<pair> is probably sufficient. I noticed that Swindle has <list>, though.
Did not investigate how that is checked.

    Joel

-- 
OpenPoker: The Linux of poker software
http://wagerlabs.com/forums
* Tenerife * Canary Islands * Spain





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]