[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables
From: |
Sven . Hartrumpf |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:16:35 +0100 (CET) |
On 26 Jan 2005, Ed Watkeys <address@hidden> wrote:
> When I started working programming in Scheme, I was amazed to find that
> there weren't any standard procedures that returned the implementation
> name and version. With such a mechanism, it would be much easier to
> re-define procedures to ensure that your MzScheme code will execute in
> Chicken.
>
> (cond
> ((eq? (scheme-implementation) 'mzscheme)) ; do nothing
> ((eq? (scheme-implementation) 'chicken)
> (define hash-table-put hash-table-set)
> ; and whatever else...
> ))
>
> Providing a framework for this sort of porting solution is do-able,
And has been done: SRFI-0 (most Schemes define an identifier for their
implementation).
Ciao
Sven
pgpFHTifed663.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Sven . Hartrumpf, 2005/01/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Ed Watkeys, 2005/01/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Larry White, 2005/01/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Larry White, 2005/01/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Ed Watkeys, 2005/01/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Ed Watkeys, 2005/01/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables,
Sven . Hartrumpf <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Alex Shinn, 2005/01/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Ed Watkeys, 2005/01/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Benedikt Rosenau, 2005/01/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Alex Shinn, 2005/01/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Alex Shinn, 2005/01/28
Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, Andreas Rottmann, 2005/01/26
Re: [Chicken-users] functions for hash tables, felix winkelmann, 2005/01/27