Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

chicken-users (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Jul 31 2005 16:29:52 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• July 31, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Lightweight threads, etc. : Chicken vs. Gambit, Joel Reymont, 16:29
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Patch for open-input-file segfault, felix winkelmann, 12:45
  • [Chicken-users] Patch for open-input-file segfault, Reed Sheridan, 02:02
• July 29, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Better algorithm for growing hash tables, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 17:41
• July 28, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] udp.scm on cygwin, Daishi Kato, 22:09
  • [Chicken-users] C_SIZEOF_FLONUM not really correct, Daniel B. Faken, 17:09
  • [Chicken-users] Better algorithm for growing hash tables, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 15:38
  • [Chicken-users] minor note for manual on (define-foreign-record), Daniel B. Faken, 12:32
• July 27, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] FFI unsigned long pointer, Zbigniew, 18:05
  • Re: [Chicken-users] the (##sys#call-host) FFI trick, Daniel B. Faken, 17:36
  • [Chicken-users] the (##sys#call-host) FFI trick, Daniel B. Faken, 16:59
  • [Chicken-users] Re: Constructing parameter lists in C: can I use FFI?, Ash, 16:59
  • [Chicken-users] FFI unsigned long pointer, Toby Butzon, 09:37
• July 25, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-setup failure with gmp, felix winkelmann, 18:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Constructing parameter lists in C: can I use FFI?, felix winkelmann, 17:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Constructing parameter lists in C: can I use FFI?, felix winkelmann, 17:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Constructing parameter lists in C: can I use FFI?, Daniel B. Faken, 11:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] signed-char* not handled correctly, Daniel B. Faken, 10:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Constructing parameter lists in C: can I use FFI?, felix winkelmann, 10:19
  • Re: [Chicken-users] static compile with eggs, felix winkelmann, 04:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] signed-char* not handled correctly, felix winkelmann, 03:30
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem with Syntax Case in 2.0, felix winkelmann, 02:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] minor documentation fix, felix winkelmann, 02:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Let me guess... [was Re: A question about http-server demo code.], felix winkelmann, 02:06
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_alloc OK before C_invoke? (was Re: Constructing parameter lists in C), felix winkelmann, 02:01
• July 24, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Experimental controller/routes support in HTTP egg., Ed Watkeys, 23:32
  • [Chicken-users] Let me guess... [was Re: A question about http-server demo code.], Ed Watkeys, 22:33
  • [Chicken-users] A question about http-server demo code., Ed Watkeys, 21:59
• July 23, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-setup failure with gmp, Raffael Cavallaro, 02:36
• July 22, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] xosd:delete?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 23:04
  • [Chicken-users] xosd:delete?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 20:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-setup failure with gmp, Dale Jordan, 19:35
  • [Chicken-users] chicken-setup failure with gmp, Raffael Cavallaro, 17:35
  • [Chicken-users] minor documentation fix, Daniel B. Faken, 17:30
  • [Chicken-users] signed-char* not handled correctly, Daniel B. Faken, 12:49
  • [Chicken-users] static compile with eggs, Daishi Kato, 12:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_alloc OK before C_invoke? (was Re: Constructing parameter lists in C), Daniel B. Faken, 12:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Recipe for distributing C files problematic, John.Cowan, 09:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C_alloc OK before C_invoke? (was Re: Constructing parameter lists in C), felix winkelmann, 09:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem with Syntax Case in 2.0, felix winkelmann, 09:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Recipe for distributing C files problematic, felix winkelmann, 08:40
• July 21, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Problem with Syntax Case in 2.0, Dale Jordan, 15:38
  • [Chicken-users] C_alloc OK before C_invoke? (was Re: Constructing parameter lists in C), Daniel B. Faken, 12:02
  • [Chicken-users] Constructing parameter lists in C: can I use FFI?, Daniel B. Faken, 10:46
  • [Chicken-users] Recipe for distributing C files problematic, John.Cowan, 08:13
• July 20, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] non-blocking (read), Daishi Kato, 20:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] non-blocking (read), Daishi Kato, 08:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] 5 years ago ..., felix winkelmann, 04:27
  • Re: [Chicken-users] non-blocking (read), felix winkelmann, 03:58
  • [Chicken-users] 5 years ago ..., Sven . Hartrumpf, 03:22
• July 19, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] non-blocking (read), Thomas Chust, 07:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] non-blocking (read), Daishi Kato, 06:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] non-blocking (read), felix winkelmann, 04:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] libffi in chicken-2.0, felix winkelmann, 04:02
• July 18, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] non-blocking (read), Daishi Kato, 21:52
  • [Chicken-users] libffi in chicken-2.0, Daniel B. Faken, 14:58
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: bug report: inexact->exact && srfi-18, felix winkelmann, 04:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Out-of-date arguments in some egg setups, felix winkelmann, 03:23
• July 17, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Out-of-date arguments in some egg setups, Kon Lovett, 17:57
  • [Chicken-users] Re: bug report: inexact->exact && srfi-18, Kon Lovett, 17:28
  • [Chicken-users] bug report: inexact->exact && srfi-18, Reed Sheridan, 15:55
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken 2.0 released, felix winkelmann, 04:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy still crashes occasionally, felix winkelmann, 04:00
  • Re: [Chicken-users] New egg: doctype, felix winkelmann, 03:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] New egg: eggdoc, felix winkelmann, 03:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] non-blocking (read), felix winkelmann, 03:25
• July 15, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] gdbm.egg patch, felix winkelmann, 08:17
  • [Chicken-users] non-blocking (read), Daishi Kato, 04:16
• July 14, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Documentation system?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 09:21
  • [Chicken-users] New egg: doctype, Zbigniew, 00:58
  • [Chicken-users] New egg: sxml-transforms, Zbigniew, 00:57
  • [Chicken-users] New egg: eggdoc, Zbigniew, 00:56
• July 13, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] gdbm.egg patch, Daishi Kato, 22:02
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chg to cscbench for MacOS X, felix winkelmann, 19:52
  • [Chicken-users] current state of affairs, felix winkelmann, 19:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy still crashes occasionally, felix winkelmann, 19:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Documentation system?, felix winkelmann, 19:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] gdbm.egg patch, felix winkelmann, 19:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] foreign-lambda* problems on Mac OS X, Raffael Cavallaro, 11:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] foreign-lambda* problems on Mac OS X, Thomas Chust, 08:32
• July 12, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Scoots: Scheme implementation of Ruby on Rails routes feature, Ed Watkeys, 14:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] foreign-lambda* problems on Mac OS X, Raffael Cavallaro, 11:10
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Scheme, Chicken, and Parrot, felix winkelmann, 10:22
  • Re: [Chicken-users] foreign-lambda* problems on Mac OS X, felix winkelmann, 10:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] foreign-lambda* ?, Thomas Chust, 05:59
• July 11, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] foreign-lambda* ?, Raffael Cavallaro, 16:19
  • [Chicken-users] Spiffy still crashes occasionally, Peter Bex, 13:18
• July 08, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Re: Scheme, Chicken, and Parrot, Leopold Toetsch, 09:02
  • [Chicken-users] Scheme, Chicken, and Parrot, John Lenz, 03:03
• July 06, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] foreign-lambda* problems on Mac OS X, Raffael Cavallaro, 23:00
• July 05, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] gdbm.egg patch, Daishi Kato, 09:25
• July 04, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Documentation system?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 23:33
• July 03, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Chg to cscbench for MacOS X, Kon Lovett, 18:38

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc