[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables
From: |
Alejandro Forero Cuervo |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 00:49:04 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
> When, on the other hand, n is prime, o is always 1 so you won't need
> to worry about this (you'll just need to worry that no single value
> from hash(A) occurs more often than others).
Erm, o is always 1 or n. I'll leave it up to you to figure out what
happens when o is n.
Alejo.
http://azul.freaks-unidos.net/
---=( Comunidad de Usuarios de Software Libre en Colombia )=---
---=( http://bachue.com/colibri )=--=( address@hidden )=---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2005/08/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables, Ed Watkeys, 2005/08/01
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables, Nelson Castillo, 2005/08/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables, Ed Watkeys, 2005/08/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables, Toby Butzon, 2005/08/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables, Ed Watkeys, 2005/08/02
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables, Ed Watkeys, 2005/08/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 2005/08/03
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Better algorithm for growing hash tables,
Alejandro Forero Cuervo <=