[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] A few questions...
From: |
Benedikt Rosenau |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] A few questions... |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:33:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:53:37AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
> Q3: What are you missing most desperately from Chicken, or better:
> if there is one thing that you really want it to have, what would that be?
I would like have an arity-function, i.e.:
(define (bla fasel) ...)
(arity bla) = > 1
It should also give the arity in cases like:
(define (blubb . fasel) ...)
Maybe one can encode the arity as a negative number in these cases.
After all, Chicken knows the negative zero now...
Benedikt
- Re: [Chicken-users] A few questions..., (continued)