Re: [Chicken-users] 'const' types not working in define-foreign-record

[Daniel B. Faken]

On Sat, 27 Aug 2005, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On 8/25/05, Daniel B. Faken <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> >   When I define a type like c-string, int, and others as 'const' (i.e.
> > (const c-string), (const int), ..) their accessors give garbage output.
> > 
> 
> Which accessors? Are you defining them purely as types, or inside
> a (foreign) record?

Yes, I'm using define-foreign-record and trying to make some fields 
immutable (i.e. avoiding the definition of setters) by declaring their
types e.g. (const int) instead of int.

I'll post an example on Monday.

thanks,
Daniel