Re: [Chicken-users] callbacks without having a C_toplevel()

[Daniel B. Faken]

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On 8/25/05, Daniel B. Faken <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> >   My question: what is the *appropriate* way to go about this?
> >   Or, what is the minimum "boilerplate" required for a C_toplevel()
> >   which just calls (return-to-host)?
> >   - compiling just this statement generates about 130 LOC.
> > 
> > (maybe there should just be a C_return_to_host_toplevel to pass?)
> 
> The proper way is to have a minimal Scheme toplevel, but it's inconvenient
> if you just want to eval a few expressions. 
> 
> The current darcs head has a new library unit (stub), that does basically
> just a (return-to-host). You can pass CHICKEN_default_toplevel as an
> argument to CHICKEN_run.

Great; thanks!

Daniel