[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros.
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros. |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 05:59:03 +0100 |
On 11/19/05, Pupeno <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thursday 17 November 2005 14:23, felix winkelmann wrote:
> > You will have to add reader-procedures (via set-read-synrax!
> > or set-dispatch-read-syntax!) for the missing macros yourself
> > and skip the contents.
>
> After reading about it, it seem I'll had to implement about 16 cases of
> different string processing procedures, not nice indeed, any better
> solution ?
>
You only need to handle compiler-specifiic syntax, which is mainly
#> ... <#-
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., Pupeno, 2005/11/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros.,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., Pupeno, 2005/11/21
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., felix winkelmann, 2005/11/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., Pupeno, 2005/11/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., felix winkelmann, 2005/11/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., Pupeno, 2005/11/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., felix winkelmann, 2005/11/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., Pupeno, 2005/11/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., felix winkelmann, 2005/11/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., Zbigniew, 2005/11/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Handling unstandard reader macros., Pupeno, 2005/11/24