|
From: | Bob McIsaac |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] Win32 maintainer needed.. compiler semantics |
Date: | Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:24:00 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) |
Watcom is literal minded about import libraries.. The import library
should only show what is exported by the DLL. Therefore, the "chicken.exe" target should link the import library plus another library containing objects that were compiled with import declarations. Trying to use Makefile.vc as a model, as I did, is confusing because of different compiler semantics. felix winkelmann wrote: On 1/10/06, Sergey Khorev <address@hidden> wrote:Ok. It seems that Brandon and me can cover these tasks. I'll take a look what can be done for Open Watcom. If someone wants to use it, why not? Ppersonally I can't find sufficiently good reason to migrate to Watcom besides of probability to get slightly better optimised code.It's mostly a free tool alternative, independent of M$ and suppossedly easy to use. It's not the *main* alternative, but if we can support it without too much hassle, we should.What is your position regarding resurrecting MSVC makefile and creating Watcom-specific Makefile?I'll ressurrect makefile.vc and send you everything we currently have for watcom. Thanks for helping with this! cheers, felix _______________________________________________ Chicken-users mailing list address@hidden http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |