|
From: | Kon Lovett |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] objc egg v0.4 |
Date: | Mon, 23 Jan 2006 17:14:37 -0800 |
Best Wishes, Kon On Jan 21, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Zbigniew wrote:
On 1/21/06, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:objc:box/unbox instead of objc:wrap/unwrapThat's not a bad idea.obj-c:* instead of objc:*)?The "objc" prefix is, near as I can tell, universal in Lisp--OpenMCL, Gauche--and other implementations---Python, Ruby, even Emacs' objc-mode---and I think we should stick with that. On a personal note, I find obj-c:class-name to be more visually confusing than objc:class-name. Of course, if enough people support a change I will make it.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |