Re: [Chicken-users] find-files

[felix winkelmann]

On 2/1/06, Zbigniew <address@hidden> wrote:
> Just noticed that find-files traverses symbolic links to directories
> (since directory? returns true for a directory symlink).  I'm not sure
> this behaviour is desirable---at least there should be the option to
> skip symlinks or treat them strictly as files.

You can do that check in the predicate or in the limit procedure.
Adding yet another optional argument makes `find-files' even clunkier
than it already is... ;-)


cheers,
felix