[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:16:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Shawn Rutledge scripsit:
> Another idea I had is if Scheme people could agree on an ideal VM
> implementation (like Java or C# has), and an efficient portable binary
> data format, then binary transport (like RMI in Java) and binary
> serialization to files would be more trustworthy.
Scheme people can't even agree on the contents of their language beyond
a bare minimum. Dream on.
> As for Chicken, is there a VM? I'm guessing not, because for speed
> you just use the compiler, and therefore not a lot of emphasis would
> be placed on making the interpreter the fastest.
No, Chicken does not have a VM.
> IMO somebody needs to write a better editor for S-expressions. Good
> XML editors are also nontrivial.
"Good" XML editors are impossible, because they have to serve mutually
contradictory goals. The only hope is to have a variety of adequate
editors with different purposes.
> XML is such a fad, but it is far from optimal for either machines or humans.
That's the whole idea.
> At work I came up with a binary format that is portable, and allows
> you to store the same kind of structures as you would express in XML
> (trees of name-value pairs), [...]
In that case you might as well use ASN.1, which has the advantage of
being an international standard with multiple data representations
available (including a textual one). IMHO there is little point in
concocting yet another binary representation of XML.
In any case, it's just *one* use case of XML to provide trees of
name-value pairs. The world already has too many ways to do
XML without mixed content, but mixed content is the crown jewel
of XML.
--
First known example of political correctness: John Cowan
After Nurhachi had united all the other http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Jurchen tribes under the leadership of the address@hidden
Manchus, his successor Abahai (1592-1643)
issued an order that the name Jurchen should --S. Robert Ramsey,
be banned, and from then on, they were all The Languages of China
to be called Manchus.
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, (continued)
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, Pupeno, 2006/04/25
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/04/25
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, Shawn Rutledge, 2006/04/25
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, F. Wittenberger, 2006/04/27
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/04/27
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, F. Wittenberger, 2006/04/25
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, Shawn Rutledge, 2006/04/25
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework,
John Cowan <=
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, john, 2006/04/26
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, Shawn Rutledge, 2006/04/26
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, john, 2006/04/27
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, John Cowan, 2006/04/27
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, F. Wittenberger, 2006/04/27
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, John Cowan, 2006/04/27
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, F. Wittenberger, 2006/04/27
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, Thomas Chust, 2006/04/25
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, felix winkelmann, 2006/04/26
- Re: OT: Re: [Chicken-users] rails-like framework, F. Wittenberger, 2006/04/27