[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] (repl) in compiled files
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] (repl) in compiled files |
Date: |
Wed, 10 May 2006 07:37:52 +0200 |
On 5/9/06, Dan <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi all,
(repl) in a compiled file doesn't seem to know about
variables or functions imported from modules. Is this
normal? How can I work around this?
;; mod1.scm
(module mod1 (f1)
(define (f1 x) x))
;; x.scm
(require 'mod1) (import mod1)
(display f1) (newline)
(define (f2 x) x)
(repl)
csc -R syntax-case -sv mod1.scm
csc -R syntax-case -v x.scm
% ./x
#<procedure (mod1$$f1 g14861487)>
#;> f2
#<procedure (f2 g14871488)>
#;> f1
Error: unbound variable: f1
#;>
The repl still uses the low-level macro system.
Entering "(require-extension syntax-case)" and
"(import mod1)" in the repl should work.
(you can also say "(require 'syntax-case)" in x.scm,
which will load the syntax-case extension at run-time,
sth like "(eval '(import mod1))" will make it available
right away in any subsequently eval'd code, like from
the repl).
(felix)
cheers,
felix