FW: Re: [Chicken-users] synch egg renaming

[Thomas Chust]

Sorry, I forgot to Cc the list on this message, so I forward it again:

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: "Thomas Chust" <address@hidden>
Gesendet: 21.07.06 08:22:37
An: Kon Lovett <address@hidden>
Betreff: Re: [Chicken-users] synch egg renaming

Hello,

in my humble opinion the new names are as good or bad as the old ones -- I 
would have chosen completely different symbols in the first place. But changing 
the names would break a bunch of my existing code, so I vote for a new egg or 
for leaving the names as they are if there isn't a more important reason to 
change them than mere aesthetics.

cu,
Thomas

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Kon Lovett <address@hidden>
Gesendet: 20.07.06 17:36:33
An: chicken <address@hidden>
Betreff: [Chicken-users] synch egg renaming

[...]

call/synch => call-with/synch
apply/synch => call/synch
apply-with/synch => apply/synch

apply-with/synch will now use the mutex specific as the 1st argument.

Added synch-with which binds a local variable to the mutex specific.

So *-with means "with mutex specific".

[...]


______________________________________________________________
Verschicken Sie romantische, coole und witzige Bilder per SMS!
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail: http://f.web.de/?mc=021193