[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:53:32 +0200 |
On 7/31/06, Brandon J. Van Every <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Is there *some* way to have a single tarball layout?
Sure. I suggest creating /boot/*.c.in files as the CMake build does.
That way, people won't get confused about .c files in their toplevel
directory, whether those were built in-directory or came with the
tarball, etc.
Next question: can the CMake build omit the "boot" and create the
.c files in the toplevel directory?
(I know you won't like it, but is it possible?)
Anyway, there won't be two different tarballs, so we have to solve
this either by modifying either the cmake or the autotools build.
cheers,
felix
--
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, John Cowan, 2006/07/31
- [Chicken-users] more Cygwin library names, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] more Cygwin library names, John Cowan, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] more Cygwin library names, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/07/31
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/07/30
Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, felix winkelmann, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, felix winkelmann, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, felix winkelmann, 2006/07/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] CMake tarballs, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/07/31