[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Bizarre chicken build/segfault problem
From: |
Kon Lovett |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Bizarre chicken build/segfault problem |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:30:15 -0700 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sep 11, 2006, at 11:55 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
<snip>
Aha, that explains. I'm using the latest version, but I was looking
in the Chicken svn repos, libc, ld.elf_so etc. I never thought that
the compilation would use another egg! Stupid me :)
During compilation the needed eggs should only be necessary for
checking imports. The actual code (*.scm, *.c, etc.) of the needed
eggs shouldn't be touched. So no, not stupid you ;-).
(Except for syntax & include modules, but that isn't the issue here.)
You might as well also get the current locale, miscmacros, numbers, &
misc-extn eggs. These are also needed.
They should be automatically installed right? Anyway, I have them.
Yeah, but I had prophylactic measures in mind.
Hope you have a more productive time after re-installing.
I'll try and trace the segfault I got on lookup-table. Then I can get
productive again :)
Was probably an undefined variable referenced from srfi-29. The
lookup-table is compiled unsafe so this sort of thing will not be
reported.
<snip>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkUFuUcACgkQJJNoeGe+5O5t3ACdGuBBKpvSD5VlVbxqv4x1MfnH
p9YAn1azD4hCK8n0jjdX7TzFTnkMoj0b
=TOfp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----