[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] stack traces
From: |
Dan |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] stack traces |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Nov 2006 05:16:08 -0800 (PST) |
Hi,
for some reason csi gives me c**p instead of real
stack traces:
<eval> [function-name] (cdr (cdr g1256))
... on and on for 10 levels...
No line numbers, no file names, nothing. Oh, and
mangled variable names. Is this the "standard" these
days, or have I misconfigured something? All code is
interpreted in csi (I haven't compiled anything).
If it is, I hope it changes, because it's disgusting.
One suggestion regarding the mangled names: instead of
replacing variables with "pure" gensyms, use something
like x --> g1256:x
-- Dan
____________________________________________________________________________________
Sponsored Link
Mortgage rates near 39yr lows.
$510k for $1,698/mo. Calculate new payment!
www.LowerMyBills.com/lre
- [Chicken-users] stack traces,
Dan <=