On 11/28/06, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
On 11/28/06, Kon Lovett <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Looking at the current psyntax source I notice the use of
'gensym?'.
> Now, given the Chez Scheme providence, the use of this makes sense.
> However, implementing it in Chicken requires changes.
>
Sorry, I might be a bit on the slow side, but what about
(define (gensym? x)
(and (symbol? x) (not (##sys#interned-symbol? x))))
(I tried to point this out by mentioning the previously attached
psyntax.scm which contains this code Perhaps you didn't notice, or
perhaps I misunderstand your intentions completely. If it is the
latter, Sorry - just ignore me).