|
From: | Tony Sidaway |
Subject: | [Chicken-users] Re: read-lines bug and a suggested bug fix |
Date: | Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:35:51 +0000 |
1. I really should test things. 2. I don't use the (do) form in my coding and it shows. 3. The following fix has been tested on the sample data. ((if (eof-object? ln) (reverse lns)(or (eq? n 0)(reverse (cons ln lns)))))
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |