|
From: | Dan Muresan |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] csc segfaults with certain recursive sources |
Date: | Mon, 28 May 2007 12:09:29 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 |
Serves you quite right - a segfault is not sufficient for someone who does these perverted things. You should rightfully suffer for this...
Um, I wasn't saying that this should work. The point was that a segfault usually uncovers a deeper problem, such as a buffer overflow that may or may not occur under other circumstances as well. But, if Felix is happy with a segfault, that's fine.
Notice that reversing the compilation order does not produce a segfault. -- Dan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |