[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Choosing chicken
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Choosing chicken |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Jun 2007 13:39:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Shawn W. scripsit:
> That's what I meant about getting other people's views. Personally, I
> don't care if something can run on Windows or not so having that as a
> plus wouldn't have ever occurred to me. Thanks!
Here's my list:
- Strong (even though not perfect) standards adherence
- Fast (even though not the fastest) compiled code
- Highly portable generated C
- Large egg library
- Unicode support
- Vibrant community
- Fast-responding maintainer (that would be Felix; thanks, Felix)
The first three features led me to choose Chicken for a particular project
where I was replacing a C program and needed to be able to deliver C
source that was competitive in performance. The remaining features made
Chicken my Scheme-of-all-work.
--
As we all know, civil libertarians are not John Cowan
the friskiest group around -- comes from address@hidden
forever being on the qui vive for the sound http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
of jack-booted fascism coming down the pike. --Molly Ivins
Re: [Chicken-users] Choosing chicken, Shawn W., 2007/06/02
- Re: [Chicken-users] Choosing chicken,
John Cowan <=
Re: [Chicken-users] Choosing chicken, Sunnan, 2007/06/04