chicken-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] inlining


From: Sven . Hartrumpf
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] inlining
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:00:11 +0200 (CEST)

Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:46:19 -0700 (PDT), elf wrote:

> what does the source file look like?

No relevant declarations, only

(declare (uses posix))
(use regex)
(use srfi-37)
(use qdbm)

> my understanding is that with usual-integrations (the default), a bunch of 
> stuff is automatically inlined.  depending on what youre declaring in the
> source file, and depending on the size of things,

I have some smaller functions with 1-3 expressions
that should be inlinable.

> perhaps these are the only
> inlinable procedures.

But in one call I increased the inline-limit from 10 (the default)
to 50. And to be sure, I just tried even with -inline -inline-limit 300 ...
This should show a difference, but it did not.

>  or perhaps theres a (declare (inline)) in the source.

None.

Thanks for your considerations, but we didn't find a solution,
I think.

Ciao
Sven

Attachment: pgpaNzrFLUIQb.pgp
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]