[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] inlining
From: |
Sven . Hartrumpf |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] inlining |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Sep 2007 21:00:11 +0200 (CEST) |
Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:46:19 -0700 (PDT), elf wrote:
> what does the source file look like?
No relevant declarations, only
(declare (uses posix))
(use regex)
(use srfi-37)
(use qdbm)
> my understanding is that with usual-integrations (the default), a bunch of
> stuff is automatically inlined. depending on what youre declaring in the
> source file, and depending on the size of things,
I have some smaller functions with 1-3 expressions
that should be inlinable.
> perhaps these are the only
> inlinable procedures.
But in one call I increased the inline-limit from 10 (the default)
to 50. And to be sure, I just tried even with -inline -inline-limit 300 ...
This should show a difference, but it did not.
> or perhaps theres a (declare (inline)) in the source.
None.
Thanks for your considerations, but we didn't find a solution,
I think.
Ciao
Sven
pgpaNzrFLUIQb.pgp
Description: PGP signature