[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?
From: |
Tobia Conforto |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander? |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Dec 2007 11:50:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> http://packages.debian.org/sid/chicken-bin
>
> It certainly seems production quality and decently performant to me;
> does the Chicken community still agree with the statements there?
I find them biased and misleading. Those statements, coupled with the
maintainer's laziness in updating the packages, are probably turning
quite a few people away from Chicken. Either he is acting in bad faith,
or he's lost interest in it. In any case I would welcome a change.
Tobia
- [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Robin Lee Powell, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2007/12/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/19
- [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?,
Tobia Conforto <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, felix winkelmann, 2007/12/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Zbigniew, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, John Cowan, 2007/12/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Debian slander?, Peter Busser, 2007/12/27