Re: [Chicken-users] nondescript eggs

[Daishi Kato]

Hi,

swt should be fine if jni works well,
but it's not tested and I'm not going to maintain it.

On the other hand, I would like to continue to develop
wxchicken, which is not complete yet at all,
but I'm currently not working on it due to time limitation.
Any help would be welcome.

Daishi

At Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:31:23 +0100 (CET),
Felix Winkelmann wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello!
> 
> The following eggs have currently no ".meta" file and seem to
> be in a state of flux, or have not been implemented yet
> (but are registered in the repository:
> 
>     * binary-tree/
>     * dns/
>     * filesystem/
>     * gl-display-glx/
>     * gl-font/
>     * libapreq-mfd-parser/
>     * meroonet/
>     * methods/
>     * minioop/
>     * scoop/
>     * sockets/
>     * statvfs/
>     * swt/
>     * wxchicken/
> 
> These have been moved into the "nondescript" branch and can be
> accessed as usual (the permissions will be updated accordingly).
> Whoever is working on these, please consider moving them into
> the release/3 branch later, once you think they are ready for
> being made available.
> 
> 
> cheers,
> felix
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
> 
> ******************************
>  XREA.COM -Free Web Hosting-
>  http://www.xrea.com/
> ******************************