[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] record-type-name in SRFI-9
|
From: |
Peter Danenberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] record-type-name in SRFI-9 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:17:19 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) |
> Does SRFI-9 specify it? I can't find any reference.
Under "accessors for record types," Felix, the implementation defines
it along with record-type-field-tags; is the implementation
non-binding?
We all severely lament your departure, by the way.