[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for nul
From: |
Graham Fawcett |
Subject: |
Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)) |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Mar 2008 16:40:27 -0500 |
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Shawn Rutledge
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Chicken Literary is all in a panic that the stacks are falling.
lol!
Fortunately, Chicken Literary and his friends visited the fox, Henry
Baker, who reminded them that their stacks are GC'd frequently. All
was well again in Chicken Literary Land!
But when he added that function-calls never return, Chicken Literary
and friends lapsed into an existential stupor. And Henry the Fox ate
them.
G
- Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI), Elf, 2008/03/01
- Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI), John Cowan, 2008/03/02
- Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI), Elf, 2008/03/02
- Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI), Graham Fawcett, 2008/03/02
- chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)), Elf, 2008/03/02
- Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)), Shawn Rutledge, 2008/03/03
- Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)),
Graham Fawcett <=
- Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)), Shawn Rutledge, 2008/03/03
- Re: chicken literary spoofs (was: Re: argument against using '() for null values? ([Chicken-users] DBI)), Elf, 2008/03/03