Re: [Chicken-users] Re: with-open-pipe to handle sigpipe

[Lui Fungsin]

Hi Alan,

> you could then handle in an exception handler on your primary
> stack, instead of the signal stack.

That sounds like the way to go.

> If you set SIGPIPE to the chicken equivalent of SIG_IGN, any error
> message writing to the pipe will be returned by write(2) instead,

I'm not sure I followed you here. What's chicken's equivalent of SIG_IGN?

Care to write a few lines of pesudo code to illustrate what you said?

Thanks,
--fungsin