[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?) |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:14:05 +0200 |
>
> That looks good. If we don't want to play with Windows registry and
> Unix symlinks, couldn't chicken-setup, when installing a `foo' egg,
> pick the highest version and generate a foo.scm containing something
> like:
>
> (require-library foo-1.2)
>
> Considering 1.2 is the highest version number for the foo egg in the
> local repository.
>
> Would that work?
>
Yes, that would work. You would also need a file for foo-1, I suppose,
if one wants to to load the highest minor version of 1.XXX. This will
produce lots of little loader-files, though. Either we use this or really
create a table that is kept in sync by chicken-setup and which is
consulted once the first egg is loaded.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?, (continued)
- [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?, William Xu, 2008/07/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?, Ivan Raikov, 2008/07/10
- [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?, William Xu, 2008/07/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?, felix winkelmann, 2008/07/10
- Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), Peter Bex, 2008/07/10
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), felix winkelmann, 2008/07/10
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), Peter Bex, 2008/07/10
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), felix winkelmann, 2008/07/11
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), Peter Bex, 2008/07/11
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), Mario Domenech Goulart, 2008/07/11
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?),
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), Mario Domenech Goulart, 2008/07/14
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), felix winkelmann, 2008/07/14
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), minh thu, 2008/07/14
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), felix winkelmann, 2008/07/14
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), Peter Bex, 2008/07/14
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), Shawn Rutledge, 2008/07/10
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), Elf, 2008/07/10
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), John Cowan, 2008/07/10
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), Elf, 2008/07/10
- Re: Chicken-setup redesign (was: Re: [Chicken-users] Re: getopt, getopt_long?), Shawn Rutledge, 2008/07/10