Re: [Chicken-users] tinyclos and the repl

[Elf]

are you using the eval unit and using the repl function contained therein, or
did you roll your own repl?  also, you should be able to require the 
chicken-more-macros via (require 'chicken-more-macros) at the top.

-elf

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:

> Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 12:57 +0200 schrieb Thomas Chust:
> > Rene Sansman wrote:
> >
> > > [...]
> > > Chicken has worked wonderfully for me so far, but now I have run into
> > > a problem I don't know how to solve. I want to use tinyclos from the
> > > repl, but it does not work. I can use it from compiled code or from
> > > the interpreter, but not from a repl that I start from a compiled
> > > scheme file.
> > > [...]
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > the REPL started from your program doesn't have access to the same
> > macros as the compiled source. There are at least two possible solutions
> > to this problem: You can explicitly load the tinyclos support macros at
> > runtime or you can instruct the compiler to retain all macros for
> > runtime using a (declare (run-time-macros)) form.
>
> There must be at least one more trick.  I failed to get the latter
> working.  Or better say: I got it half working: macros *defined* in the
> unit, which did (declare (run-time-macros)) where available, but I
> failed to get chicken-more-macros included.  How would I do that?
>
> thanks
>
> /Jörg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users