Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

chicken-users (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 2008 01:28:16 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• August 31, 2008
  • [Chicken-users] hygienic named let, Jim Ursetto, 01:28
• August 28, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Expanding ellipsis on lists of different length, Elf, 10:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Expanding ellipsis on lists of different length, Tobia Conforto, 10:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Expanding ellipsis on lists of different length, felix winkelmann, 05:59
• August 27, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] pretty-print, Graham Fawcett, 19:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Expanding ellipsis on lists of different length, Elf, 19:33
  • [Chicken-users] pretty-print, Daishi Kato, 17:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-setup in the hygienic branch, Mario Domenech Goulart, 17:25
  • [Chicken-users] starvation in i/o intensive situations, F. Wittenberger, 17:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-setup in the hygienic branch, Tobia Conforto, 16:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Expanding ellipsis on lists of different length, Tobia Conforto, 15:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Expanding ellipsis on lists of different length, Elf, 15:02
  • Re: [Chicken-users] base64 import problem with chicken-hygienic, Graham Fawcett, 14:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Hygienic Chicken's desftruct issue, Peter Bex, 14:30
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-setup in the hygienic branch, Peter Bex, 13:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] base64 import problem with chicken-hygienic, Peter Bex, 13:32
  • [Chicken-users] chicken-setup in the hygienic branch, Tobia Conforto, 13:05
  • [Chicken-users] Expanding ellipsis on lists of different length, Tobia Conforto, 12:58
  • [Chicken-users] base64 import problem with chicken-hygienic, Graham Fawcett, 12:11
  • Re: Local documentation [was: Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!], Elf, 06:06
  • Local documentation [was: Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!], felix winkelmann, 05:33
• August 26, 2008
  • Re: Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg, a5a54280, 09:29
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, felix winkelmann, 05:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, felix winkelmann, 05:07
  • Wiki HTML structure (Was: Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!), Peter Bex, 03:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, Elf, 01:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, Ivan Raikov, 01:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ANNOUNCE: Grace 1.0.2, felix winkelmann, 00:17
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, felix winkelmann, 00:14
• August 25, 2008
  • Fwd: Re: Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg, vmanis, 21:33
  • [Chicken-users] ANNOUNCE: Grace 1.0.2, Heinrich Taube, 20:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Hygienic Chicken's desftruct issue, Elf, 20:28
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, Elf, 20:22
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, Ivan Raikov, 20:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Hygienic Chicken's desftruct issue, Alan Post, 17:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Hygienic Chicken's desftruct issue, Alonso Andres, 16:49
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Hygienic Chicken's desftruct issue, John Cowan, 16:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Hygienic Chicken's desftruct issue, Peter Bex, 16:13
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Hygienic Chicken's desftruct issue, Alonso Andres, 16:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Tobia Conforto, 15:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Hygienic Chicken's desftruct issue, Peter Bex, 14:52
  • [Chicken-users] Hygienic Chicken's desftruct issue, Alonso Andres, 14:29
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, Tobia Conforto, 13:00
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, John Cowan, 12:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, Alan Post, 12:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 4: how to generate toplevel definitions?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 09:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Elf, 09:22
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Elf, 09:19
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, felix winkelmann, 09:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 4: how to generate toplevel definitions?, Peter Bex, 08:54
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken 4: how to generate toplevel definitions?, Mario Domenech Goulart, 08:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, Ivan Raikov, 06:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, Peter Bex, 06:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, Peter Bex, 06:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, Peter Wright, 05:52
  • [Chicken-users] hygienic egg PORT-A-MANIA!, felix winkelmann, 05:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Tobia Conforto, 05:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Matt Welland, 01:20
• August 24, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Jim Ursetto, 17:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Matt Welland, 15:22
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Jim Ursetto, 13:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Elf, 07:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Elf, 07:45
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Elf, 06:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Elf, 06:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, felix winkelmann, 05:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Jim Ursetto, 04:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Qt egg, david krentzlin, 03:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Matt Welland, 01:22
• August 23, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, John Cowan, 17:35
  • [Chicken-users] Good way to code the equivalent to this?, Matt Welland, 17:32
  • [Chicken-users] Qt egg, Vincent Manis, 11:09
  • [Chicken-users] Re: new setup tools, felix winkelmann, 07:07
• August 22, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] new setup tools, Leonardo Valeri Manera, 12:32
  • [Chicken-users] new setup tools, felix winkelmann, 07:43
• August 21, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken on linux64, Graham Fawcett, 17:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken on linux64, felix winkelmann, 03:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken on linux64, Sven Hartrumpf, 02:31
• August 20, 2008
  • [Chicken-users] Re: How are exceptions propagated? - details on the race, F. Wittenberger, 18:00
  • [Chicken-users] chicken on linux64, Graham Fawcett, 16:15
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: S11n Egg Problem, felix winkelmann, 02:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: How are exceptions propagated?, felix winkelmann, 02:29
• August 19, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 18:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 16:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Alex Queiroz, 13:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Graham Fawcett, 13:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Elf, 11:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 11:15
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, John Cowan, 10:02
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Graham Fawcett, 10:02
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Elf, 09:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Tobia Conforto, 09:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 08:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Embedded Chicken, felix winkelmann, 08:19
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, felix winkelmann, 08:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: patch to with-*-*-file, felix winkelmann, 08:05
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Tobia Conforto, 07:33
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 06:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Wang Xin, 06:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Alaric Snell-Pym, 05:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 05:28
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 05:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: patch to with-*-*-file, F. Wittenberger, 04:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: patch to with-*-*-file, felix winkelmann, 02:59
• August 18, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] An alternative thread system?, Vincent Manis, 20:45
  • Re: [Chicken-users] An alternative thread system?, Graham Fawcett, 16:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Embedded Chicken, John Van Enk, 15:28
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Embedded Chicken, Elf, 15:25
  • [Chicken-users] Embedded Chicken, John Van Enk, 15:08
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Possible formating Bug in SRFI-19?, Kon Lovett, 15:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Dual-format macros, Elf, 12:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Tobia Conforto, 12:24
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Elf, 12:19
  • [Chicken-users] Dual-format macros, Tobia Conforto, 12:17
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Possible formating Bug in SRFI-19?, Elf, 12:02
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Possible formating Bug in SRFI-19?, Elf, 11:58
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Elf, 11:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Elf, 11:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 11:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Possible formating Bug in SRFI-19?, F. Wittenberger, 11:29
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Possible formating Bug in SRFI-19?, John Cowan, 11:15
  • [Chicken-users] Possible formating Bug in SRFI-19?, F. Wittenberger, 10:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, F. Wittenberger, 10:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Wang Xin, 09:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Alaric Snell-Pym, 07:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Tobia Conforto, 06:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Wang Xin, 06:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] code snippet (suggested for the wiki) - and several newcomer questions, F. Wittenberger, 05:33
• August 17, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Tobia Conforto, 15:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] code snippet (suggested for the wiki) - and several newcomer questions, Tobia Conforto, 15:12
  • [Chicken-users] Re: patch to with-*-*-file, F. Wittenberger, 10:06
  • [Chicken-users] patch to with-*-*-file, F. Wittenberger, 09:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Race condition in scheduler.scm, F. Wittenberger, 08:27
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Race condition in scheduler.scm, Elf, 06:48
• August 16, 2008
  • [Chicken-users] egg announcement: remote-repl, Elf, 22:53
  • [Chicken-users] Race condition in scheduler.scm, F. Wittenberger, 19:38
  • [Chicken-users] code snippet (suggested for the wiki) - and several newcomer questions, F. Wittenberger, 19:15
• August 15, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Xin Wang, 22:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Tobia Conforto, 19:16
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Tobia Conforto, 18:25
• August 14, 2008
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Wang Xin, 20:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: S11n Egg Problem, Elf, 04:28
• August 13, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Ivan Raikov, 20:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Alaric Snell-Pym, 13:00
  • [Chicken-users] Re: S11n Egg Problem, Joshua Griffith, 06:09
  • [Chicken-users] Re: S11n Egg Problem, Joshua Griffith, 05:39
  • [Chicken-users] Re: S11n Egg Problem, felix winkelmann, 05:30
  • [Chicken-users] S11n Egg Problem, Joshua Griffith, 02:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Aleksej Saushev, 02:30
  • Re: [Chicken-users] are additional make-input-port's argument ok to use, felix winkelmann, 01:43
• August 12, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] are additional make-input-port's argument ok to use, Elf, 22:31
  • [Chicken-users] are additional make-input-port's argument ok to use, F. Wittenberger, 18:52
  • [Chicken-users] Re: How are exceptions propagated?, F. Wittenberger, 10:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, F. Wittenberger, 06:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Alaric Snell-Pym, 05:30
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken with VIM, Wang Xin, 05:19
• August 11, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Ivan Raikov, 23:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Shawn Rutledge, 22:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] svn bootstrap broken?, Ivan Raikov, 21:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Alaric Snell-Pym, 19:24
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Elf, 18:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Elf, 18:19
  • [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Aleksej Saushev, 17:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Elf, 17:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, John Cowan, 16:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Aleksej Saushev, 16:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Shawn Rutledge, 16:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Elf, 15:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Aleksej Saushev, 15:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, Elf, 12:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, F. Wittenberger, 11:06
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, Elf, 10:28
  • [Chicken-users] Re: make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, F. Wittenberger, 09:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] svn bootstrap broken?, Elf, 09:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] svn bootstrap broken?, F. Wittenberger, 08:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] svn bootstrap broken?, Elf, 08:27
  • [Chicken-users] svn bootstrap broken?, F. Wittenberger, 08:16
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, john, 06:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] bug in default `match', felix winkelmann, 05:02
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, F. Wittenberger, 04:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, F. Wittenberger, 04:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Elf, 03:49
  • [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Aleksej Saushev, 02:25
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Ivan Raikov, 00:45
• August 10, 2008
  • [Chicken-users] Re: An alternative thread system?, Aleksej Saushev, 23:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] An alternative thread system?, Vincent Manis, 21:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, Vincent Manis, 21:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] An alternative thread system?, Ivan Raikov, 21:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] An alternative thread system?, Elf, 14:44
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, Elf, 14:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, F. Wittenberger, 12:13
  • Re: [Chicken-users] An alternative thread system?, Adam C. Emerson, 12:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, John Cowan, 10:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, Elf, 04:52
• August 09, 2008
  • [Chicken-users] bug in default `match', Alex Shinn, 11:49
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, Vincent Manis, 10:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, F. Wittenberger, 07:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, F. Wittenberger, 07:19
  • [Chicken-users] An alternative thread system?, F. Wittenberger, 07:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, Tobia Conforto, 06:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, F. Wittenberger, 06:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, F. Wittenberger, 06:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, John Cowan, 03:45
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, Kon Lovett, 01:35
• August 08, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, Elf, 22:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, Vincent Manis, 22:32
  • [Chicken-users] Please do not drop 'thread-terminate!' from the SRFI 18 impl, Kon Lovett, 19:30
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Elf, 18:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, felix winkelmann, 18:27
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, John Cowan, 18:26
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, felix winkelmann, 18:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, felix winkelmann, 18:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, John Cowan, 12:09
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Thomas Chust, 09:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, F. Wittenberger, 05:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Vincent Manis, 03:12
• August 07, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, John Cowan, 22:53
  • [Chicken-users] How are exceptions propagated?, F. Wittenberger, 17:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, F. Wittenberger, 17:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, F. Wittenberger, 17:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, F. Wittenberger, 17:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, John Cowan, 12:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, John Cowan, 12:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Vincent Manis, 11:28
  • [Chicken-users] make-parameter, parameterize & SRFI-39, F. Wittenberger, 11:08
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, felix winkelmann, 09:04
  • [Chicken-users] deadlock - why endless looping in error messages, F. Wittenberger, 06:55
• August 06, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Fix for Segfault - a hard one, Ivan Raikov, 21:43
  • [Chicken-users] SRFI-34 egg, F. Wittenberger, 07:04
  • [Chicken-users] Fix for Segfault - a hard one, F. Wittenberger, 06:46
• August 05, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Peter Hochgemuth, 11:08
• August 04, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Ivan Raikov, 23:07
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Jim Ursetto, 22:43
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Ivan Raikov, 22:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Ivan Raikov, 22:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, Jim Ursetto, 22:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Last two snapshots (3.3.5 and 3.3.6) are broken, Aleksej Saushev, 17:40
  • [Chicken-users] Segfault - a hard one, F. Wittenberger, 15:29
• August 03, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] return a pair of ints from a C function?, Shawn Rutledge, 15:26
• August 02, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Last two snapshots (3.3.5 and 3.3.6) are broken, Vincent Manis, 11:08
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Last two snapshots (3.3.5 and 3.3.6) are broken, Peter Bex, 09:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] return a pair of ints from a C function?, felix winkelmann, 06:20
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Last two snapshots (3.3.5 and 3.3.6) are broken, felix winkelmann, 06:11
• August 01, 2008
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Last two snapshots (3.3.5 and 3.3.6) are broken, Ivan Raikov, 21:24
  • [Chicken-users] Last two snapshots (3.3.5 and 3.3.6) are broken, Aleksej Saushev, 14:42
  • Re: [Chicken-users] return a pair of ints from a C function?, Shawn Rutledge, 02:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] return a pair of ints from a C function?, Shawn Rutledge, 02:15

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc