Re: [Chicken-users] s11n and tinyclos

[felix winkelmann]

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Shawn Rutledge
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On 10/29/08, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
>> This means that no entry is stored in the local "procedure table".
>>  What's the output of "chicken -version"? Does it show "ptables"?
>
> Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner...
>
> Yes it has ptables.
>
> [neutron][12:08:00 AM] chicken -version
>
> CHICKEN
> (c)2008 The Chicken Team
> (c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann
> Version 3.4.0 - linux-unix-gnu-x86-64   [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables
> applyhook hostpcre ]
> SVN rev. 11987  compiled 2008-10-23 on neutron (Linux)
>
> I get the same result on a 32-bit machine too.
>

Is it possible, that you are using stale eggs? Could you try to
reinstall the eggs you need for your application (or install
a new chicken into a temporary location and install all
eggs from scratch)? If all involved modules generate ptables
properly, then the behaviour you observer should actually not be possible
(if it does, then some compiled procs are not ptable'd, which would
be a severe bug). All .so's and libraries should export a "create_ptable"
symbol, which you can check with

  nm <so-or-lib> | grep create_ptable


cheers,
felix