[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:55:38 +0100 |
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 12:21 AM, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> felix winkelmann scripsit:
>
>> Note that crunch is highly experimental and incomplete. You requirements
>> are tough, and you will not find many functional languages that don't require
>> GC. Stalin and MLton come to mind (perhaps one can make GC at least
>> unlikely, or reduce it to a minimum).
>
> Stalin uses the Boehm conservative GC.
>
That's correct. But (provided Stalin an infer enough allocation information from
the code) GC can sometimes be avoided.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Rick R, 2009/02/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Thomas Chust, 2009/02/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Tobia Conforto, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Rick R, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, John Cowan, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Peter Bex, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, John Cowan, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Peter Bex, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, John Cowan, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Peter Bex, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Ivan Raikov, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Chicken-users] Optimal C, Rick R, 2009/02/23