[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Questions about modules
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Questions about modules |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:01:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Jack Trades scripsit:
> The manual says: A module is initially empty (has no visible bindings). But
> I've noticed that some identifiers are available without importing
> anything. Is there a list of these identifiers? I've come up with the
> following through testing...
> #t, #f, if, lambda, let, letrec, define-syntax, import
#t and #f are not identifiers, so they are available everywhere, just
as numbers and characters are.
If you don't have import you're kind of helpless.
The rest are probably implementation artifacts.
--
Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out.
--Arthur C. Clarke, "The Nine Billion Names of God"
John Cowan <address@hidden>
- [Chicken-users] Questions about modules, Jack Trades, 2009/06/15
- Re: [Chicken-users] Questions about modules,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Questions about modules, Peter Danenberg, 2009/06/15
- [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, Jack Trades, 2009/06/17
- [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, felix, 2009/06/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, Jack Trades, 2009/06/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, felix winkelmann, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, Jack Trades, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, felix winkelmann, 2009/06/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, Jack Trades, 2009/06/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Questions about modules, felix winkelmann, 2009/06/23