|
From: | Matthew Welland |
Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] Proposed procedure movement in Chicken 4 |
Date: | Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:33:11 -0700 |
User-agent: | KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-14-generic; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; ) |
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 03:14:50 pm Derrell Piper wrote: > Someone asked me what I meant by my first comment. I checked > Salmonella and it reports the following statistics for eggs (4 on top, > 3 on bottom): > > Failed 99 > Succeed 334 (76%) > Skipped 4 > Total 437 > > Failed 65 > Succeed 139 (67%) > Skipped 4 > Total 208 > > ...which seems to indicate that less than half the eggs made the > transition from 3 to 4. I think that that's probably not a good > thing. The plethora of eggs is one of Chicken's major strengths. I > just wanted to point that out if you're considering changes that might > break even more of them. > > Seems like you already have a substantial broken egg problem with > > Chicken 4 already. You sure you want to break yet more eggs? Do > > you have the ability to fix all the eggs? If so I think you should > > consider that as part of this re-org. I also dislike 'Utils'; > > that's awfully generic. You've already got 'extras'. Is that > > function in Utils or Extras? Precisely. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Chicken-users mailing list > > address@hidden > > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users > > _______________________________________________ > Chicken-users mailing list > address@hidden > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |