Re: [Chicken-users] sequences egg

[John Cowan]

Felix scripsit:

> > I don't see much point in the constructors, really.  Schemers already
> > understand how to make lists and vectors.
> 
> Sorry, I don't understand this remark.

Ah.  I just assumed that random access sequences and linear access
sequences were vectors and lists respectively, but looking at the code
I see they aren't.  What advantages do they have?

> I know all these by heart.

I figured that, but a sequence library is useful in proportion to its
richness, so I'd add more functions.

-- 
John Cowan                              <address@hidden>
            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
                .e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
                Please support Lojban!          http://www.lojban.org