[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Gazette - Issue 13
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken Gazette - Issue 13 |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:19:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:32:24AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> > == 2. Core development
> > The scrutinizer was updated to give a warning when a one-armed `if`
> > is used in tail-position, as suggested on chicken-users by Jörg
> > Wittenberg.
>
> sure? or is -- no, wait, no "git" struggle now. spare me, please!
Just wait for the next dev snapshot.
> As I said with a smiley in the other posting: I would never enter into a
> religious war.
>
> Therefore I have to raise a flag in favour of the great SQLite data
> base!
>
> Right here!
>
> Why?: How does your PostgreSQL handle master-master replication?
I've never had use for that so I don't really know. But this wiki page
sounds hopeful:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication%2C_Clustering%2C_and_Connection_Pooling#Comparison_matrix
I didn't know SQLite had any replication whatsoever at all. Or did you
roll your own? If so, you could do that with any database!
> What
> if I mount a man in the middle attack on one of your master replicas and
> inject fake update packets? Will I be able to tamper with your data
> base? Too bad for you!!! ;-)
That's what SSL connections (with client certificates) are for.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth