Re: [Chicken-users] loopy-loop

[Alex Shinn]

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Hugo Arregui <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi guys, I'm facing an unexpected behaviour using loopy-loop:

Is there a reason you're using loopy-loop instead
of the newer fast-loop?

> shows 6,5 as expected, but:
>
> (loop lm ((m <- in-range-reverse 6 4))
>      (print m)
>      (lm))

That's a bug, I'll fix it.

> Also, this:
>
> (loop lm ((m <- in-range 4))
>      (print m)
>      (lm))
>
> is given me an error:

The error message isn't very helpful, but the problem is
you need an endpoint in the range.

-- 
Alex