[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-users] Re: obscure error message after refactoring
From: |
Alan Post |
Subject: |
[Chicken-users] Re: obscure error message after refactoring |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:46:16 -0700 |
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 06:58:27AM -0700, Alan Post wrote:
> I've been refactoring the interface between 3 of the subsystems in
> my egg, genturfa'i. I've made a ton of changes to the code, and
> am at the point where I'm ready to compile everything and figure
> out what is broken. I run chicken-install -s, and as it tries
> to compile my library, gives me the following error:
>
> Error: (caddr) bad argument type: *
>
> Call history:
>
> <syntax> (##core#begin (define genturfahi-version-major 0)
> (define genturfahi-version-minor 0) (define gentur......
> <syntax> (define genturfahi-version-major 0)
> <syntax> (##core#set! genturfahi-version-major 0)
> <syntax> (define genturfahi-version-minor 0)
> <syntax> (##core#set! genturfahi-version-minor 0)
> <syntax> (define genturfahi-version-patch 1)
> <syntax> (##core#set! genturfahi-version-patch 1)
> <syntax> (define genturfahi-version "trunk")
> <syntax> (##core#set! genturfahi-version "trunk")
> <syntax> (##core#undefined) <--
>
> Error: shell command terminated with non-zero exit status 17920:
> /opt/chicken-master/bin/chicken chicken-ext.scm -output-file
> genturfahi.c -dynamic -feature chicken-compile-shared -feature
> compiling-extension -setup-mode -debug-level 2 -emit-import-library
> genturfahi
>
> I don't have an explicit call to caddr anywhere in my code, and I
> believe the following line:
>
> <syntax> (##core#set! genturfahi-version "trunk")
>
> Refers to the last line in the last file of my library.
>
> I've been looking over diffs trying to see if I've introduced a
> subtle scope or syntax error somewhere, but I'm not having much
> luck.
>
> What do I do with an error message like the one above? It isn't
> obvious to me where I need to look to fix the problem.
I've narrowed this down to any of the four uses of |match| I now
have in my code. I don't understand yet why it is giving me this
error message, but debugging one pattern in four functions feels
less burdensome that looking for a misplaced token somewhere in the
library.
-Alan
--
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi