[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] environment egg - any replacement?
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] environment egg - any replacement? |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:32:16 +0200 (CEST) |
> So: I've been using the environment eggs code for some things.
> This does not work any longer. I'd rather like to keep the
> code compatibility with rscheme and chicken's eval.
>
> So far I've been using only four functions:
>
> make-environment
> environment-extend!
> environment-copy
> environment-ref
>
> These I found so far to be kind of the minimum to enable envt
> manipulations from user code.
>
> Could we have such a thing? I'm ready to hack the code overnight,
> but what's the API chicken does need right now and which changes
> to this API are expected to come more sooner than later?
There will be a replacement, but it will need some modifications
in the evaluator. Do you evaluate a lot of code, are the environments
long- or short-lived and small or large? Do you reuse them or create
many environments on the fly?
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-users] types.db incorrect, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] types.db incorrect, Felix, 2011/09/06
- Re: [Chicken-users] types.db incorrect, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] types.db incorrect, Felix, 2011/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-users] types.db incorrect, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/10
- Re: [Chicken-users] types.db incorrect, Felix, 2011/09/10
- [Chicken-users] superflous definition in library.scm?, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/12
- [Chicken-users] environment egg - any replacement?, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/12
- Re: [Chicken-users] environment egg - any replacement?,
Felix <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] environment egg - any replacement?, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/13
- Re: [Chicken-users] superflous definition in library.scm?, Felix, 2011/09/12
Re: [Chicken-users] tcp-*-timeout in types.db incorrect?, Felix, 2011/09/06