Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN

[Thomas Chust]

2011/9/15 Felix <address@hidden>:
> [...]
> One question: would it be possible to optionally support SRFI-17 setters for
> record slots?
> [...]

Hello Felix,

for SRFI-99 compliance, separate setter procedures must be
generated. But the getter procedures generated by my implementation
for mutable fields already have a SRFI-17 setter attached (check lines
217 through 222 of srfi-99.scm).

Ciao,
Thomas


-- 
When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb.