[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] obsolete code
|
From: |
Alex Shinn |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] obsolete code |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:28:50 +0900 |
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Jörg F. Wittenberger
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> But not including those two definitions should IMHO not do any harm.
> I simply can not see where those would be used within irregex.scm.
Sorry, I thought you were suggesting importing
srfi-1 instead of using those definitions.
The references to them do seem to have been
removed recently.
--
Alex
- Re: [Chicken-users] a memory issue; mildly scaring to me, (continued)
- [Chicken-users] define-compilter-syntax / define-syntax -- a quastion // posibly a bug, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] a memory issue; mildly scaring to me, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/26
- [Chicken-users] obsolete code, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/26
- [Chicken-users] irregex.scm, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] obsolete code, Alex Shinn, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Chicken-users] obsolete code, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] obsolete code,
Alex Shinn <=