[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:29:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 03:22:06PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> While I've been looking at the code I wondered if the C compiler
> will fur sure pull that one test out of the for-loop.
>
> Maybe it's better no have it there at the first place.
> IMHO the code is not more confusing to read this way and should
> run better in case the C compiler is not smart enough.
I'm firmly opposed to any such change that makes the code
much less readable for very little gain.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
- [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Alan Post, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Alex Shinn, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Alan Post, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Alex Shinn, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Alan Post, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Alex Shinn, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Alan Post, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Toby Thain, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] two minor tweaks to runtime.c, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2011/09/29