[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] A proposal for egg category reassignment
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] A proposal for egg category reassignment |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:17:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:51:29PM +0900, Ivan Raikov wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It seems that the egg categories "Uncategorized or invalid" and
> "Miscellaneous" have swelled quite a bit since the last time there was a
> major reorganization.
>
> So I propose to reassign the categories of the eggs listed below to
> what I like to believe are more sensible categories. If an egg belongs
> to you, and you do NOT want me to change the category, please let me
> know within a week or so. If you think a different category is a better
> match, then please let me know as well. Thanks,
Note that not all eggs may be hosted on Subversion, and you may not have
access to them all. Furthermore, the new system requires eggs to be
tagged before the category is changed (it shows the information from the
latest release, ie that which you will get if you simply "chicken-install"
it).
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
Re: [Chicken-users] A proposal for egg category reassignment, Peter Bex, 2011/10/11