Re: [Chicken-users] bit-set? seems to be buggy

[Peter Bex]

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:12:57PM +0100, address@hidden wrote:
> 2012/1/6 Peter Bex <address@hidden>:
> >
> > Chicken's bit-set? is not from SRFI-60.  It has a swapped argument order.
> > See the manual:
> > http://api.call-cc.org/doc/library/bit-set%3F
> >
> > (by the way, it would be nice if its author could put the docs in a wiki
> >  page so that api.call-cc.org can pick up on it)
> 
> It is probably easer to do it just like the rest of the Scheme world does it.

Agreed. However, it's too late now; changing this procedure's signature
while maintaining backwards-compatibility is impossible.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth